皇冠体育app(www.hg9988.vip)_Proposed telco merger outside MyCC's purview, CEO says
,皇冠体育app(www.hg9988.vip)是一个开放皇冠网址即时比分、皇冠网址代理最新登录线路、皇冠网址会员最新登录线路、皇冠网址代理APP下载、皇冠网址会员APP下载、皇冠网址线路APP下载、皇冠网址电脑版下载、皇冠网址手机版下载的皇冠体育app官方下载平台。
PETALING JAYA: The proposed merger between Digi Bhd (Digi) and Celcom Axiata Bhd (Celcom) does not lie within the purview of the Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC).
In a statement on Saturday (July 2), MyCC chief executive officer Iskandar Ismail said they were aware of repeated calls for them to intervene but added that the activities of telecommunication providers are subject to the scrutiny of the Malaysia Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC), through provisions of the Communications and Multimedia Commission Act 1998.
Also read: MCMC approves Celcom-Digi merger
Iskandar said that while the Competition Act 2010 applies to any commercial activity within Malaysia, the Act clearly states that it does not apply to commercial activities in four sectors.
He added that this includes the telecommunications and multimedia sector, among others.
“In this regard, MyCC leaves matters related to the said proposed merger to the wisdom of the MCMC and is certain that a careful assessment and evaluation process has been carried out by them prior to reaching a decision,” he said.
He added that MyCC’s current amendment exercise aimed at introducing a merger control regime in Malaysia was also on track but highlighted that several sectors were excluded from its purview such as those under the MCMC.
“At the same time, we hope that future decisions by MyCC on merger applications will be the main reference and guide for all other authorities in ensuring a consistent and robust policy landscape that will create certainty in the market,” he said.
转载说明:本文转载自Sunbet。
网友评论
别-Tmd、叁芯2.意つ
回复雨巷
回复@别-Tmd、叁芯2.意つ
恨不早点看见!足球预测(www.99cx.vip)
回复作者很有前途啊
USDT不用实名交易(www.usdt8.vip)
回复懒人宅家看文,安逸~
欧博aLLbet(www.aLLbetgame.vip)
回复@USDT不用实名交易(www.usdt8.vip) Judge Hayatul Akmal Abdul Aziz, in allowing the application, ruled that the subject matter was non-justiciable and the plaintiff, Mohd Hatta Sanuri, had no locus standi to bring the legal action against the defendants (prime minister and the government).唯美,温馨
Telegram美国群(www.tel8.vip)
回复其实够好了